Rank #4

Peec AI

Analytics for how often your brand shows up in AI search, with ranked recommended actions and MCP on every plan.

8.1/10

Checked 12 November 2026

Verdict: The best no-code dashboard for marketing teams; pick it if you want to watch and act yourself.

What it does

Peec AI tracks your prompts daily on the engines you pick and reports visibility, citation share and the domains and URLs AI answers use as sources, including retrievals and query fan-outs. It ranks recommended actions (owned and earned), runs agent actions, audits crawlability and tracks AI referrals and bot visits. MCP is on every plan; the API starts on Pro.

Who it suits

Marketing teams who want a clear, no-code dashboard with daily tracking and unlimited seats, at a published price.

Who should skip it

You need many engines at once on a small plan: the base plans let you choose three.

Strengths

Clean dashboard with daily tracking and unlimited users
MCP on every plan
URL-level source views, fan-outs and citation share
Ranked recommended actions and crawl insights

Limits

Three engines on paid plans; more are an add-on from $30/month
API only from Pro ($245/month)
Full raw answer text not verified

Cost: Starter $95/month billed monthly (50 prompts, 3 models, 1 project, unlimited users); Pro $245/month adds the API. Free trial. Check peec.ai/pricing.
Engines: Choose 3 of ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews, AI Mode, Gemini, Naver AI Briefing, ERNIE, Bing AI Mode; more as add-ons; Enterprise up to 26 models.
API and MCP: MCP on all plans; API from Pro.
Sources: Pricing · MCP

Criterion scores

Citation tracking coverage 25%9/10
Visibility, citation share and sources on your prompts, plus AI referral tracking and bot-visit crawl insights.
Answer engines covered 15%7/10
Many engines offered, three on base plans and the rest as add-ons.
API and MCP access 15%8/10
MCP on every plan; API needs Pro.
Pricing transparency 10%9/10
Every self-serve plan priced, with a free trial.
Actionability 20%8/10
Ranked recommended actions and agent actions tied to the gaps it finds.
Evidence quality 15%7/10
Domain- and URL-level sources, retrievals and fan-outs; raw answer text not verified.